Skip to main content
Counselled by Cohen Davis Solicitors
๐Ÿšจ Howell admits paying DrummondSee proof โ†’
#33Key DocumentsKEY DOCUMENTยท

Catalogue of 65+ Lies: A Complete Forensic Breakdown of Every Fabricated Claim (from andrewdrummondlies.pdf)

The master catalogue. Every single provably false statement with evidence-based rebuttal, drawn from the comprehensive andrewdrummondlies.pdf document.

In Depth

The definitive reference document: every provably false statement Drummond has published about Bryan Flowers and associated parties, catalogued individually with (a) the exact claim verbatim, (b) the article(s) in which it appears, (c) the evidence-based rebuttal, (d) the category of severity (critical / major / moderate), and (e) the relevant legal framework (UK Defamation Act 2013 section, Malicious Communications Act 1988 offence, Protection from Harassment Act 1997 element). Bryan's solicitors at Cohen Davis have separately identified a subset of these as 'legally indefensible' โ€” meaning they cannot be justified under any UK defence (truth, honest opinion, public interest). The interactive browsable version is at /lies (deep-linkable to /lies#lie-N for per-claim citation). This paper is the canonical PDF export and the primary evidence exhibit for the UK criminal complaint to Wiltshire Police and for any future civil action.

Source

The full text of this paper is published on drummondrecord.com, one of the source sites that make up the 391+ paper archive of the Drummond-Howell Campaign Record. Opening it will take you off this site.

Open the full paper โ†’

Related in Key Documents