Skip to main content
Counselled by Cohen Davis Solicitors
🚨 Howell admits paying DrummondSee proof →
New

The transcript-grounded master evidence dossier is now live — includes per-video Bryan quotes, US + UK law mapping, and the minor-doxing case.

View master dossier →
Deep Channel Analysis + Platform Warning

Odysee Analysis — @Soi6Whistleblower

The @Soi6Whistleblower channel on Odysee — operated by Adam Howell — hosts 85videos directed at a single private individual, Bryan Flowers, and his family. This page maps every one of those videos against Odysee's own published Community Guidelines and against UK criminal law. The picture that emerges is unambiguous: this is not a creator account subject to occasional lapses of judgement; it is a campaign account whose entire output is in breach of the rules Odysee itself claims to enforce. Odysee was sent a detailed, video-by-video evidence report in 2025 and has, at the time of writing, left the channel operational. That is why this page also doubles as a public warning about Odysee as a platform.

Share:
85
Videos on channel
7
Community-Guideline categories breached
15
Thematic allegation categories
4
UK criminal / civil offences engaged

Channel at a glance

Channel URL
odysee.com/@Soi6Whistleblower:9
Operator (attributed)
Adam Howell — Canadian national, b. 2 March 1982; convicted of criminal defamation 28 August 2025 (Thai court); fled Thailand to Dubai ~February 2026 with 5–6M baht in unpaid debts
Subject (targeted)
Bryan Flowers and his family — private individuals, no public office, no celebrity status, no criminal charges outstanding in any jurisdiction
Prior platform history
YouTube channel banned for harassment-policy violations; Rumble account banned; migrated to Odysee + BitChute + PeerTube. The pattern is a textbook platform-migration harassment signature.
Funding model
Paid via Adam Howell — admitted in writing in a Facebook Messenger conversation (see /evidence/paid-to-troll)
Odysee notice given
Detailed per-video evidence report submitted to Odysee, 2025 — see /platform-complicity for executives named in correspondence (Sam Williams, Julian Chandra CEO, Sebastian Compos Groth)

Odysee Community-Guideline Violations

The following are Odysee's own published rules, quoted verbatim from help.odysee.tv/communityguidelines. Each rule is followed by the number of videos on this single channel that breach it, a plain-English explanation of why, and example video IDs from the full catalogue at /attacks/odysee-catalogue.

G5

Illegal activity

22 videos
Don't use Odysee for illegal activities, this includes sharing illegal or copyright-infringing content.— Odysee Community Guidelines

Defamation is unlawful in both the UK (Defamation Act 2013) and Thailand (Criminal Code §§326–333). 22 videos contain false criminal allegations against Bryan Flowers — sex trafficking, child abuse, bribery, money laundering, organised crime — with no underlying charge, no conviction, no warrant. Content creator Adam Howell has been convicted of criminal defamation in a Thai court (28 August 2025). The content is, as a matter of fact, the record of an illegal act being committed on Odysee's infrastructure.

Example videos (15) →
G6

No doxing

11 videos
Don't dox individuals, users or otherwise.— Odysee Community Guidelines

Multiple videos name, identify, or expose private individuals who are not public figures: Bryan's wife Punnipa Flowers (falsely labelled a 'trafficker'), his 73-year-old father (named as a 'controlling investor' with zero operational role), his brother, business partners Scott and Rob Dey, civil-case witnesses Nick Dean and Chris Berndt. Several videos include addresses, workplaces, or identifiable context amounting to doxing under any ordinary reading of the rule. Howell's own Messenger admission is that he paid Drummond extra specifically to 'drag Bryan's family and friends into it' (see /evidence/paid-to-troll).

Example videos (11) →
G9

Violence / credible calls for violence

5 videos
Content promoting terrorism, criminal activity, or that credibly calls for violence is prohibited.— Odysee Community Guidelines

At least three videos explicitly frame threats of violence — including one featuring a 'Pakistani enforcer' allegedly threatening a journalist, two that associate Bryan with gang violence involving tourists on Soi 6, and edited audio presented as menacing. Regardless of who the threats come from, hosting them on a platform that claims to bar 'credible calls for violence' is itself a direct breach by the uploader. The 'cashier will pay' video meta-adjudicates a threat against a witness.

Example videos (4) →
G10

No excessive bullying of non-public figures

All 85 videos
Excessive bullying of persons not well known within the public sphere is restricted.— Odysee Community Guidelines

Bryan Flowers is a private individual — a businessman with no political office, no celebrity status, and no pre-existing public profile outside his own customer base. 85 separate videos (every single one on the channel) are directed at him personally, by name, over a sustained period. That is not 'reporting' or 'criticism' — it is the textbook definition of excessive bullying of a non-public figure. If Guideline 10 means anything, it means this. The same test applies to Bryan's wife Punnipa, his father, his brother, and his business associates — none of whom are public figures either.

G11

No content shaming / insulting / exploiting minors

4 videos
Content uploaded with the intent to shame, deceive, insult, or exploit a minor is banned.— Odysee Community Guidelines

Several videos directly insult a 17-year-old Thai girl — repeatedly calling her a 'whore', asserting she was 'sold in 11 minutes', and framing her story in lurid terms for an adult audience. Whatever the truth of her individual circumstances (she has retracted her original statement in court), she is a minor, and the videos' intent is to shame and insult her. That alone breaches Guideline 11. The gratuitously sexualised framing of her against an adult audience also engages Guideline 17 (voyeurism / sexualised invasive content).

Example videos (5) →
G12

No pornographic material

10 videos
Pornographic material is prohibited.— Odysee Community Guidelines

The 'Jizzflicker' and 'InternationalHardman' series (10 videos) are a catalogue of sex-tourism content framed as 'mongering' — graphic descriptions of transactional sex in Pattaya bars, with titles like 'Losing My Ladyboy Cherry', 'Sealing the Deal', 'Essential To-Do List', and 'Sports Mongering Guide'. These are presented on the channel as attributed to Bryan (a false attribution) but that is the separate Guideline 5 defamation issue. Setting aside the false attribution, the content itself is sexual in nature and uploaded for consumption — exactly what Guideline 12 prohibits.

Example videos (10) →
G17

No sexualised / invasive / harassing content about individuals

15 videos
Filming people...in a sexualized, invasive, or harassing way...is not permitted.— Odysee Community Guidelines

Multiple videos use edited footage of Bryan, his wife, his staff, and customers taken in bar environments, re-cut and narrated to imply sexual impropriety, trafficking, or predation. Separately, footage of a minor (the 17-year-old discussed above) is used in a sexualised and invasive frame. The narration adds harassing commentary the originals never contained. Channel operator Adam Howell has explicitly stated in writing he wanted 'to drag family and friends into it' — intent manifest.

Example videos (10) →

Thematic Allegation Frequency

Each of the 85 video titles was categorised by allegation theme. The distribution below shows the recurring editorial patterns — note the saturation of sexual / trafficking language, attacks on a legitimate anti-trafficking charity, and the deliberate re-framing of every aspect of Bryan's life (businesses, finances, associates) as criminal.

Attribution of obscene content10
Attack on charity allegation7
Media manipulation accusation7
Suspicious finances insinuation6
Human trafficking allegation5
Child trafficking/abuse allegation5
Organised crime/pimping framing5
Threat/harassment3
Money laundering insinuation2
Violence/assault association2
Financial impropriety insinuation2
Concealment/evidence tampering allegation2
Drug trade allegation2
Bribery allegation1
Corporate law evasion allegation1

UK Law Also Engaged — per-video count

Separately from Odysee's own rules, the channel's content engages UK criminal and civil law. The operator being resident outside the UK does not place him outside UK jurisdiction — the content is published to, and received by, UK audiences, and the complainant is UK-connected.

Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (course of conduct)85
Defamation Act 2013 (false criminal allegation)22
Malicious Communications Act 1988 (false/distressing content)15
Communications Act 2003 s.127 (grossly offensive/obscene/menacing)12
Online Safety Act 2023 — Part 5 (VSP duty of care)85
Data Protection Act 2018 (doxing of private individuals)13
Data Protection Act 2018 + UK GDPR Art.6 (publication of a child's personal data)4
Warning — Odysee as a Platform

Why Odysee.com deserves public scrutiny

Odysee markets itself as an uncensored video platform — a competitor to YouTube that does not arbitrarily remove content. That is a legitimate position. What is not legitimate is using “no censorship” as cover for ignoring one's own published rules against harassment, doxing, defamation, pornographic content, and the bullying of private individuals. Odysee has done exactly that here.

Notice received — no action

A detailed, video-by-video evidence report was submitted to Odysee in 2025. Named executives Sam Williams, Julian Chandra (CEO), and Sebastian Compos Groth are on record as having received it. The channel remains live. See /platform-complicity.

A haven for banned creators

The @Soi6Whistleblower channel migrated to Odysee after YouTube banned it for harassment-policy breaches and Rumble banned the operator's account. Odysee is actively used by individuals already ruled unfit by other platforms. That is not a neutral stance.

Scammer-friendly

The channel operator is a convicted criminal defamer with a documented crypto-scam history (Dope Coin, SuperDoge, aggressive-rebill subscription schemes). Odysee continues to host his content and the audience he has built on the platform.

No effective complaint route for private individuals

Odysee publishes rules but does not enforce them in response to notice from private complainants. The complaint process leads to no outcome even when the report cites Odysee's own rules with video timestamps.

Practical advice to readers: Odysee is not a substitute for mainstream video platforms where you might reasonably expect harassment moderation. It can be used legitimately by creators who self-moderate, but its content ecosystem includes a long tail of harassment campaigns, scammer promotions, and doxing operations that the platform has chosen not to act on. If you are considering following an Odysee channel, verify the operator's identity and prior platform history first. If you have been the target of an Odysee channel, escalate to your national regulator (UK: Ofcom, ICO; US: FTC; EU: DSA representative) — platform self-regulation is not a working remedy for Odysee as it is today.

Narrative Pattern Across the 85 Videos

The channel is not a random collection of independent videos. It is an engineered narrative that repeats five core beats, rotated across 85 productions to maximise Google surface area for name searches of Bryan Flowers, Night Wish Group, and associated businesses.

  1. 1
    The charge:a specific criminal allegation is stated as fact in the title (“sex trafficker”, “child pimp”, “money laundering”, “bribery”). The allegation has no underlying case, no charge, no conviction.
  2. 2
    The “evidence”: edited audio or video of Bryan from an unrelated context is presented under the title. The source footage does not contain what the title asserts; the narration fills the gap.
  3. 3
    The family drag-in:the video names Bryan's wife, father, brother, or an uninvolved business partner — dragging non-public-figure third parties into the narrative. This is the Guideline 6 doxing / Guideline 10 bullying component, and Howell has admitted paying extra for exactly this tactic.
  4. 4
    The amplification: the video is uploaded simultaneously to BitChute, PeerTube, Rumble (where not banned), and cross-posted on Reddit, Quora, X, Facebook. Coordination timing analysis gives an r² = 0.91 correlation between Odysee upload time and social-platform post time.
  5. 5
    The cashback: traffic is monetised via Odysee's own LBC token rewards, tip functionality, and external donation links. The business model is not “journalism with ads”; it is harassment-as-a-service with embedded tipping.

For regulators, journalists, and law enforcement

The full video-by-video evidence pack — including Odysee-Community-Guideline citations with timestamps, UK-law mapping, and the underlying audio forensic analysis — is available to lawful investigative authorities through Bryan Flowers' UK solicitors Cohen Davis.

  • UK — Wiltshire Police: evidence pack submitted September 2025 for a Protection from Harassment Act 1997 / Malicious Communications Act 1988 / Communications Act 2003 s.127 investigation
  • UK — Ofcom:Video Sharing Platform regulation engages Odysee directly; the channel and Odysee's response are relevant
  • EU — Digital Services Act (DSA): Odysee serves EU users; its notice-and-action procedures are a DSA obligation
  • Thailand — Royal Thai Police / DSI: defamation is criminal in Thailand; Howell is a convicted defamer (28 August 2025) with three further criminal cases pending

Related Documentation