Odysee Platform Complicity
The @Soi6Whistleblower channel on Odysee β operated by Adam Howell β hosts 85 defamatory videos directly targeting Bryan Flowers, his family, and named witnesses. A comprehensive evidence report was submitted to Odysee in 2025 detailing every breach of Odysee's own Community Guidelines (Guidelines 1, 5, 6 and 9 variously engaged). Odysee has received this notice and has failed to remove the channel or the contested videos. The executives below carry responsibility for that inaction.
What Was Submitted to Odysee
A detailed, video-by-video content analysis was prepared and sent to Odysee's team. For each of the 85 videos, the report set out:
- The specific Odysee Community Guideline being breached (Guidelines 1, 5, 6 and 9)
- Timestamp ranges within each video where the breach occurs
- Confirmation that the channel creator (Adam Howell) has pleaded guilty to criminal defamation
- Confirmation that 2 further criminal cases and 1 civil case are pending against him
- Content analysis showing the channel's βsole purpose is to hound myself, my family and associatesβ (complainant's own words)
The full Odysee Content Violations report forms part of the evidence pack submitted to Wiltshire Police and is available for lawful legal inquiry. Despite the report, the channel remains live.
Named Executives
Sam Williams
Odysee β Platform RepresentativeIdentified in complainant correspondence as an Odysee representative notified of the @Soi6Whistleblower harassment channel. The channel continued to operate after notice.
Julian Chandra
Odysee β Chief Executive OfficerAs CEO of the platform, Julian Chandra carries ultimate responsibility for Odysee's response to formal harassment complaints. The @Soi6Whistleblower channel β hosting 85 defamatory videos including content about a minor, family doxxing, and repeated child-trafficking allegations against the complainant β remained operational after notice.
Sebastian Compos Groth
Odysee β ExecutiveNamed in complainant correspondence as an Odysee executive notified of the harassment channel. No meaningful takedown action followed.
Governance Failure, Not Mere Hosting
This is not a case of a platform hosting contested content before being made aware. This is a case of a platform receiving a detailed, per-video, guideline-mapped complaint about content that: (a) repeatedly accuses a named individual and his family of child sex trafficking, (b) includes footage stolen from the CP Group dubbed with defamatory claims, (c) attacks named civil-case witnesses, and (d) originates from a creator who has pleaded guilty to criminal defamation in the underlying matter. Continued hosting after notice of these facts is, in the complainant's view, notice-and-ignore conduct for which responsibility rests with the named executives.