Skip to main content
Counselled by Cohen Davis Solicitors
๐Ÿšจ Howell admits paying DrummondSee proof โ†’
#6RebuttalKEY DOCUMENTยท

The Flirt Bar Raid: Police Coercion, Fabricated Evidence, and the Truth Behind the 'Under-Aged' Narrative

Definitive rebuttal: no underage girl found, she used another's real ID, was tallest in bar, police wrote 38 identical statements, police threatened her to claim trafficking, case moved to Bangkok for lack of evidence.

In Depth

The 'Flirt Bar raid' narrative is the single most repeated claim in Drummond's corpus. This paper is the line-by-line rebuttal. The facts established by police logs, CCTV, seven witness statements, and court records: the girl in question used someone else's genuine national ID (not a 'fake' ID); she was the tallest person in the bar that night and visibly an adult; the Thai police produced 38 near-identical staff statements (textual analysis confirms copy-paste), many signed under duress; the girl was subsequently pressured by police to claim trafficking and later retracted; the case was moved to Bangkok when the local court would not proceed on the evidence; the 'Flirt Bar raid' Drummond describes as a massive operation never involved an arrest of Bryan. The paper reproduces the relevant police coercion logs, witness statements, CCTV stills, and procedural records in full, and cross-indexes each Drummond claim to the specific piece of primary evidence that rebuts it.

Source

The full text of this paper is published on drummondrecord.com, one of the source sites that make up the 391+ paper archive of the Drummond-Howell Campaign Record. Opening it will take you off this site.

Open the full paper โ†’

Related in Rebuttal